With its standard Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection, the Toyota Tacoma is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Nissan Frontier, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
Tacoma |
Frontier |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-19 MPH |
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
37 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-21 MPH |
Warning Issued-Brights |
2 sec |
1.6 sec |
37 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-27 MPH |
Warning Issued-Low beams |
2.3 sec |
1.6 sec |
In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Toyota Tacoma achieved a “Good” rating - the highest possible - for its performance in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, demonstrating its excellent capabilities in preventing collisions. The Nissan Frontier has not been tested.
The Tacoma has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Frontier doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
Full-time four-wheel drive is optional on the Tacoma. Full-time four-wheel drive gives added traction for safety in all conditions, not just off-road, like the only system available on the Frontier.
Both the Tacoma and Frontier offer Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the Tacoma with Rear Cross Traffic Alert also has Parking Support Brake (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Frontier’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the Tacoma and the Frontier have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available blind spot warning systems and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Toyota Tacoma is safer than the Nissan Frontier:
|
Tacoma |
Frontier |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
3 Stars |
3 Stars |
HIC |
248 |
371 |
Neck Compression |
35 lbs. |
148 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
290/453 lbs. |
578/791 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
252 |
407 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.7 inches |
Neck Compression |
37 lbs. |
140 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Tacoma is safer than the Nissan Frontier:
|
Tacoma |
Frontier |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
22 |
58 |
Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.9 inches |
Abdominal Force |
78 lbs. |
170 lbs. |
Hip Force |
131 lbs. |
317 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
43 |
137 |
Spine Acceleration |
24 G’s |
55 G’s |
Hip Force |
222 lbs. |
796 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
334 |
351 |
Spine Acceleration |
38 G’s |
44 G’s |
Hip Force |
516 lbs. |
674 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Toyota Tacoma Double Cab is safer than the Frontier Crew Cab:
|
Tacoma |
Frontier |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Neck Compression |
45 lbs. |
67 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.31 in |
.79 in |
Shoulder Force |
112 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.71 in |
.98 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
602 lbs. |
625 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
96 |
427 |
Head Peak Forces |
no contact |
88 G’s |
Neck Tension |
67 lbs. |
134 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.47 in |
1.81 in |
Shoulder Force |
245 lbs. |
469 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.83 in |
1.18 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
8 MPH |
9 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
535 lbs. |
848 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |